Woman Fired By School Over Charlie Kirk Facebook Post Wins $225,000 Settlement

---

A woman who lost her job after posting a private Facebook message about conservative activist Charlie Kirk has been awarded a $225,000 settlement after claiming her firing violated her constitutional rights.

The case has become one of the most high-profile examples of the fallout that followed Kirk’s assassination in September 2025, a period that saw dozens of people across the US disciplined, suspended, or fired over comments they made online in the aftermath of his death.

Now, nearly eight months after she was dismissed, former Ball State University employee Suzanne Swierc has reached a settlement in a lawsuit backed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), marking another legal victory in a growing number of cases involving workers punished for social media posts about Kirk.

The post that sparked national backlash

Swierc worked as the Director of Health Promotion and Advocacy at Ball State University in Muncie, Indiana.

Two days after Charlie Kirk was shot and killed during an event at Utah Valley University, Swierc posted a message on her private Facebook page.

According to court filings and reports, per the New York Times, the post stated: “If you think Charlie Kirk was a wonderful person, we can’t be friends.” She also described his death as a ‘tragedy’ while arguing it reflected ‘the violence, fear, and hatred he sowed.’

Although her Facebook account was set to private, someone allegedly took a screenshot and shared it publicly without her knowledge. The post quickly spread online and was amplified by several prominent conservative figures and accounts.

Within hours, Swierc became the target of intense online criticism.

She later recalled receiving a flood of threatening calls, texts, and voicemails from strangers.

“They were calling me all kinds of names, threatening my job,” she said. “It was every awful curse word under the sun.”

The situation escalated to the point where she contacted police after receiving a voicemail referencing her home address and suggesting she should receive ‘the same treatment as Charlie.’

Fired days later

Just five days after the controversy erupted, Ball State terminated Swierc’s employment.

University officials cited the widespread reaction to the Facebook post as the reason for the dismissal, arguing it had caused significant disruption and damage to the institution.

Ball State President Geoffrey Mearns later said the backlash included angry emails, phone calls, threats to withhold donations, and concerns from prospective students and parents.

“The reaction was extraordinarily damaging to our University’s reputation and image, and it was exceptionally disruptive to our mission and our people,” Mearns said.

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita publicly praised the university’s decision at the time, describing Swierc’s comments as ‘vile’ and suggesting other educational institutions should take notice.

ACLU steps in

Days after her dismissal, the ACLU filed a federal lawsuit on Swierc’s behalf, the Guardian reports.

The organization argued that Ball State, as a public university, had violated her First Amendment rights by firing her over speech made as a private citizen on a matter of public concern.

Stevie Pactor, an attorney with the ACLU of Indiana, said the case raised important constitutional questions.

“Swierc’s firing violated her constitutional rights because she was speaking as a private citizen on a matter of public concern,” Pactor said.

“The First Amendment does not allow government institutions to retaliate in those circumstances, and this settlement reflects that.”

The lawsuit drew national attention and became a flashpoint in the debate over free speech, online outrage, and the consequences of expressing political opinions in the workplace.

Settlement reached

On May 26, 2026, the ACLU announced that the lawsuit had been settled, per the Huffington Post.

Under the agreement, Swierc will receive $225,000.

While Ball State did not admit wrongdoing, the university agreed to resolve the case rather than continue litigating.

Mearns defended the decision to settle, arguing that the payment was smaller than the cost of continuing to fight the lawsuit in court. He described the payout as a ‘modest monetary payment’ compared to potential legal expenses.

The settlement represents another significant legal defeat for institutions that disciplined employees over comments relating to Kirk’s death.

Swierc’s case is far from the only one.

Following Kirk’s assassination, more than 145 people reportedly lost jobs or faced disciplinary action after posting comments, memes, or criticisms about the Turning Point USA founder online.

Several of those cases have already resulted in major settlements.

Earlier this month, a Florida state agency agreed to pay $485,000 to a biologist who was fired after sharing a meme referencing Kirk.

In January, Austin Peay State University in Tennessee reinstated a professor and agreed to a $500,000 settlement after he challenged his dismissal over a social media post mentioning Kirk.

Other lawsuits remain ongoing.

Swierc says she doesn’t regret speaking out

Despite the backlash, threats, and loss of her job, Swierc previously said she did not regret making the Facebook post.

Reflecting on the controversy, she said she believed it was important to speak honestly about public figures and their influence.

“I am trying to start talking about what is good and right and what is not,” she said.

“I feel that we’re reaching a point in the timeline of affairs in the United States where it’s time to say something.”

For free speech advocates, the settlement is being viewed as a significant victory.

For critics, it remains another chapter in the deeply divisive political battles that erupted after Charlie Kirk’s death.

Either way, the case has become one of the most prominent examples of how a private social media post can spiral into a national controversy, and ultimately end in a six-figure legal settlement.

Related Article: Erika Kirk Responds To Claims She Has A New Boyfriend 8 Months After Assassination

Related Article: Charlie Kirk’s Wife Erika Makes Heartbreaking Baby Confession